OnlyFans and similar platforms have been heralded by some as a new frontier of female empowerment, a space where women can control their own earnings, define their own boundaries, and monetise their sexuality on their own terms. However, such arguments ignore the structural realities that push women into these industries in the first place.
Far from being genuine work in the traditional sense, OnlyFans and digital sex platforms thrive on the economic precarity of women, enticing them with promises of easy money while offering little protection from exploitation, harassment, and long-term harm. While it may be true that some women enter these platforms by choice, for the vast majority, so-called "choice" is simply a reflection of constrained economic circumstances, limited opportunities, and systemic misogyny.
This is not a system that should be celebrated, normalised, or legitimised as “work” like any other. Rather, it is a system that capitalises on vulnerability and relies on a world where women are still economically, socially, and politically disadvantaged. If such platforms are allowed to exist at all, there must be far stronger regulations to prevent the rampant exploitation, coercion, and abuse they facilitate.
The Myth of Choice: Why Women Turn to OnlyFans
The idea that OnlyFans provides "choice" is misleading. In reality, most women who turn to the platform do so because they lack viable alternatives, not because they actively seek out a career in selling sexual content.
🔹 Economic Coercion, Not Liberation
A 2022 study by the UK Women’s Budget Group found that economic instability, job insecurity, and cuts to welfare have pushed more women into online sex work, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic.
70% of women on OnlyFans reported joining due to financial hardship, with nearly half stating they would leave if they had other well-paid job opportunities (Statista, 2022).
🔹 Inequality and Power Dynamics
The platform is overwhelmingly controlled by male consumers—90% of paid subscribers are men (BBC, 2021).
The top 1% of creators earn over 33% of platform revenue, while the bottom 50% make less than £100 per month (Statista, 2022).
🔹 Psychological & Social Consequences
Research shows that women who participate in digital sex work are at higher risk of depression, anxiety, and self-harm due to constant online harassment, stalking, and societal stigma (American Psychological Association, 2021).
Studies have found that women experience long-term regret and struggle to reintegrate into traditional job markets due to the permanence of online content (University of Leeds, 2023).
This is not empowerment. It is a system that thrives on women’s economic and social disadvantage and packages desperation as a "choice".
The Dangers of Online Exploitation and the Need for Tight Regulation
Beyond the issues of economic coercion and objectification, OnlyFans and similar platforms have been repeatedly implicated in serious cases of human trafficking, child exploitation, and coercion.
🔹 Underage Content & Trafficking Risks
A 2021 BBC investigation found that minors easily bypassed age-verification systems to sell explicit content on OnlyFans.
A 2022 Reuters report uncovered numerous cases of women being coerced into creating explicit content under threats of violence and financial control.
🔹 Legal Loopholes That Facilitate Abuse
Unlike traditional workplaces, OnlyFans offers no real protections for creators, employment rights, no safeguards against exploitation, and no recourse if their content is used against them.
Traffickers and abusers have used the platform to exploit vulnerable women and girls, taking advantage of its lax oversight and weak enforcement mechanisms.
If platforms like OnlyFans are permitted to continue existing, governments must introduce strict regulations to protect women from exploitation, coercion, and harm.
Urgent Policy Changes Needed
1️⃣ Mandatory age and identity verification with robust third-party oversight.
2️⃣ Clear pathways for content removal to prevent long-term digital harm.
3️⃣ Stronger penalties for platforms that fail to prevent exploitation or trafficking.
4️⃣ Employment protections for creators, including access to legal and financial support.
5️⃣ Public funding for alternative economic opportunities for women to reduce economic coercion.
Long-Term Consequences of OnlyFans Participation
Case Study: Former creators have reported difficulties securing traditional jobs due to past content resurfacing, leading to financial instability.
The permanence of online content has resulted in women being blackmailed, harassed, or subjected to revenge porn years after leaving the platform.
Many women experience "burnout," as income often declines over time, forcing them to take riskier content decisions to maintain subscribers.
Like Pornhub and Backpage before it, OnlyFans operates in a legal grey area, where enforcement often lags behind exploitation. Without proper regulation, it risks becoming another platform notorious for failing to protect vulnerable individuals.
OnlyFans: Empowerment or Exploitation? A Critical Analysis
While defenders of OnlyFans argue that it provides women with financial autonomy and self-expression, the platform is inseparable from the systemic inequalities that funnel women into it. The idea that sexual commodification is empowering is a distortion of reality, ignoring the societal conditions that make this industry thrive.
🔹 The commodification of female bodies is not a new phenomenon, and OnlyFans merely digitises and expands this longstanding issue.
🔹 The vast majority of women engaging in digital sex work do so out of financial necessity, not because they consider it an aspirational career.
🔹 If OnlyFans is to continue operating, it must be held to the highest legal and ethical standards to protect women from coercion, exploitation, and lasting harm.
These long-term consequences further challenge the idea that OnlyFans provides real empowerment. This raises a fundamental question: Can a platform that thrives on economic disparity truly be empowering?
Empowerment is not selling one’s body because there are no better options. True empowerment would be a society where women have secure, equitable employment without being pressured into sex work for survival. Until then, platforms like OnlyFans must be met with stringent regulations, enforceable protections, and a societal reckoning with the realities of digital 'sex work'.
Comments